<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 157 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425918</link>
    <description>A tenant&#039;s separately recoverable share of municipal tax does not form part of monthly rent for deciding whether the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 applies under Section 3(f)(i), unless the tenancy agreement expressly treats it as rent. The recovery fiction under the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act and the tenancy statute operates for arrears recovery only and does not convert tax into contractual rent. Section 18, which permits 5% enhancement every three years after fair rent is fixed under Section 17, could not be used where no fair rent determination existed. On the stated facts, the statutory ceiling was tested against the actual contractual rent, and the tenancy statute applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 157 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425918</link>
      <description>A tenant&#039;s separately recoverable share of municipal tax does not form part of monthly rent for deciding whether the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 applies under Section 3(f)(i), unless the tenancy agreement expressly treats it as rent. The recovery fiction under the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act and the tenancy statute operates for arrears recovery only and does not convert tax into contractual rent. Section 18, which permits 5% enhancement every three years after fair rent is fixed under Section 17, could not be used where no fair rent determination existed. On the stated facts, the statutory ceiling was tested against the actual contractual rent, and the tenancy statute applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>