https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425915 The tribunal dismissed the appeal, concluding that WhatsApp did not contravene Section 4 of the Competition Act. It upheld the Competition Commission of India's order, finding no abuse of dominant position by WhatsApp. The tribunal determined that the allegations of predatory pricing and unfair terms were unsubstantiated. It also noted that issues concerning the Information Technology Act, 2002, were beyond its jurisdiction and should be addressed by the appropriate authorities. The tribunal recognized WhatsApp's dominant market position but found no evidence of abuse, emphasizing users' ability to opt-out of data sharing with Facebook. en-us Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2022 08:32:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425915 The tribunal dismissed the appeal, concluding that WhatsApp did not contravene Section 4 of the Competition Act. It upheld the Competition Commission of India's order, finding no abuse of dominant position by WhatsApp. The tribunal determined that the allegations of predatory pricing and unfair terms were unsubstantiated. It also noted that issues concerning the Information Technology Act, 2002, were beyond its jurisdiction and should be addressed by the appropriate authorities. The tribunal recognized WhatsApp's dominant market position but found no evidence of abuse, emphasizing users' ability to opt-out of data sharing with Facebook. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425915