<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1368 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the Petitioner&#039;s request for interim relief, appointing auditors for a forensic audit of the company&#039;s affairs. Despite objections from the Respondents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the interim relief, emphasizing corporate governance and compliance with contractual commitments. The issue of the Petition&#039;s maintainability under Section 244 of the Companies Act, 2013, due to attachment orders of shares held by the Petitioner, was addressed. The Tribunal noted that the Petition could not be dismissed based solely on provisional attachment orders pending investigation into the shares&#039; status. The Tribunal also addressed the remuneration of the auditors, to be shared equally by both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 08:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1368 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the Petitioner&#039;s request for interim relief, appointing auditors for a forensic audit of the company&#039;s affairs. Despite objections from the Respondents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the interim relief, emphasizing corporate governance and compliance with contractual commitments. The issue of the Petition&#039;s maintainability under Section 244 of the Companies Act, 2013, due to attachment orders of shares held by the Petitioner, was addressed. The Tribunal noted that the Petition could not be dismissed based solely on provisional attachment orders pending investigation into the shares&#039; status. The Tribunal also addressed the remuneration of the auditors, to be shared equally by both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>