<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 134 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425895</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal upheld the initiation of proceedings under section 153C, finding that the seized documents belonged to the assessee. However, the additional ground regarding disallowance under section 14A was admitted and remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 134 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425895</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal upheld the initiation of proceedings under section 153C, finding that the seized documents belonged to the assessee. However, the additional ground regarding disallowance under section 14A was admitted and remanded to the Assessing Officer for re-examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>