<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 127 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated by the non-jurisdictional AO and the subsequent penalty order under Section 271E. The Tribunal emphasized that the entire process was invalid due to jurisdictional errors and lack of proper application of mind by the authorities involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 08:55:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 127 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated by the non-jurisdictional AO and the subsequent penalty order under Section 271E. The Tribunal emphasized that the entire process was invalid due to jurisdictional errors and lack of proper application of mind by the authorities involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>