<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 113 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue due to lack of substantial evidence supporting allegations of undervaluation. The order of the Commissioner was affirmed, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence and adherence to legal procedures in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 113 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue due to lack of substantial evidence supporting allegations of undervaluation. The order of the Commissioner was affirmed, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence and adherence to legal procedures in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>