<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 110 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425871</link>
    <description>A debenture subscription agreement and debenture trust deed were held not to have been novated by the alleged settlement, because the settlement minutes covered only specifically recorded liabilities and the debtor&#039;s later conduct showed the debenture liability continued. The debt therefore remained enforceable and in default. An objection that the documents suffered from insufficient stamp duty also failed, as a section 7 insolvency proceeding is a summary process for establishing debt and default, and stamping issues did not bar reliance on the instruments for that limited purpose. The section 7 application was upheld and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 21:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 110 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425871</link>
      <description>A debenture subscription agreement and debenture trust deed were held not to have been novated by the alleged settlement, because the settlement minutes covered only specifically recorded liabilities and the debtor&#039;s later conduct showed the debenture liability continued. The debt therefore remained enforceable and in default. An objection that the documents suffered from insufficient stamp duty also failed, as a section 7 insolvency proceeding is a summary process for establishing debt and default, and stamping issues did not bar reliance on the instruments for that limited purpose. The section 7 application was upheld and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>