<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 107 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal, set aside the Impugned Order, and remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority to decide the fees payable to the Resolution Professional. The Tribunal reiterated that the RP&#039;s fees are not a &#039;Claim&#039; and should be determined by the Adjudicating Authority in the absence of a CoC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 107 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal, set aside the Impugned Order, and remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority to decide the fees payable to the Resolution Professional. The Tribunal reiterated that the RP&#039;s fees are not a &#039;Claim&#039; and should be determined by the Adjudicating Authority in the absence of a CoC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>