<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 104 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425865</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s distribution of SIM cards did not constitute &quot;Business Auxiliary Service&quot; but rather the sale of goods. The commission earned was not separately taxable for service tax as it was part of the sale transaction already taxed by BSNL. Concerns of double taxation were addressed, emphasizing consistency with previous tribunal decisions. The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and dismissing the miscellaneous application for additional evidence as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 104 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425865</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s distribution of SIM cards did not constitute &quot;Business Auxiliary Service&quot; but rather the sale of goods. The commission earned was not separately taxable for service tax as it was part of the sale transaction already taxed by BSNL. Concerns of double taxation were addressed, emphasizing consistency with previous tribunal decisions. The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and dismissing the miscellaneous application for additional evidence as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>