<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 101 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425862</link>
    <description>Insulated glass manufactured and sold by the assessee was treated as falling within the exclusion for plain glass-panes rather than the higher-rated entry for goods and wares made of glass. The Court relied on its earlier interpretation of similar taxing language and found no material change in the notification to justify a different reading. It accepted the Tribunal&#039;s factual assessment that the product was double-glazed and substantially akin to plain glass-panes, and no contrary material displaced that view. The classification under the exclusion was therefore sustained, and the assessee&#039;s lower-tax treatment remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 101 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425862</link>
      <description>Insulated glass manufactured and sold by the assessee was treated as falling within the exclusion for plain glass-panes rather than the higher-rated entry for goods and wares made of glass. The Court relied on its earlier interpretation of similar taxing language and found no material change in the notification to justify a different reading. It accepted the Tribunal&#039;s factual assessment that the product was double-glazed and substantially akin to plain glass-panes, and no contrary material displaced that view. The classification under the exclusion was therefore sustained, and the assessee&#039;s lower-tax treatment remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>