<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1410 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303643</link>
    <description>The court directed the release of goods in favor of the petitioner upon payment as per Section 130(2) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions in confiscation proceedings, particularly for perishable goods. The judgment highlights the necessity for authorities to comply with the Act, offering owners the opportunity to pay in lieu of confiscation, thus safeguarding their rights and ensuring procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 20:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1410 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303643</link>
      <description>The court directed the release of goods in favor of the petitioner upon payment as per Section 130(2) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions in confiscation proceedings, particularly for perishable goods. The judgment highlights the necessity for authorities to comply with the Act, offering owners the opportunity to pay in lieu of confiscation, thus safeguarding their rights and ensuring procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>