<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 111 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of Cenvat Credit on outward freight, remanding the matter for further examination. It emphasized that credit for service tax on transportation is permissible when the ownership of goods remains with the seller until delivery. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to consider if excise duty was paid based on the transaction value on an FOR basis and make a decision accordingly after hearing the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 111 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of Cenvat Credit on outward freight, remanding the matter for further examination. It emphasized that credit for service tax on transportation is permissible when the ownership of goods remains with the seller until delivery. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to consider if excise duty was paid based on the transaction value on an FOR basis and make a decision accordingly after hearing the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>