https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303633 Superior courts should exercise restraint before making adverse remarks against a subordinate judicial officer, confining observations to what is strictly necessary for the decision. Unnecessary, intemperate or castigating strictures, especially where no opportunity of hearing was afforded, may be expunged in exercise of corrective judicial power, including inherent power recognised in criminal procedure. Applying that principle, the impugned remarks against the judicial officer were found unjustified and were ordered to be expunged, while the remainder of the order was left undisturbed. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2022 18:41:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303633 Superior courts should exercise restraint before making adverse remarks against a subordinate judicial officer, confining observations to what is strictly necessary for the decision. Unnecessary, intemperate or castigating strictures, especially where no opportunity of hearing was afforded, may be expunged in exercise of corrective judicial power, including inherent power recognised in criminal procedure. Applying that principle, the impugned remarks against the judicial officer were found unjustified and were ordered to be expunged, while the remainder of the order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303633