<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 821 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303628</link>
    <description>Section 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was upheld as constitutionally valid because it permits arrest without warrant only when a police officer has information of a design to commit a cognizable offence and arrest is necessary to prevent it, while also limiting detention to 24 hours unless otherwise authorised by law. The provision was not treated as arbitrary or unreasonable merely because misuse may occur. The Court also declined to quash the criminal proceedings, as the complaints were pursued before competent criminal courts and no mala fides, abuse of process, or other legally sustainable ground for interference was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 16:49:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 821 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303628</link>
      <description>Section 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was upheld as constitutionally valid because it permits arrest without warrant only when a police officer has information of a design to commit a cognizable offence and arrest is necessary to prevent it, while also limiting detention to 24 hours unless otherwise authorised by law. The provision was not treated as arbitrary or unreasonable merely because misuse may occur. The Court also declined to quash the criminal proceedings, as the complaints were pursued before competent criminal courts and no mala fides, abuse of process, or other legally sustainable ground for interference was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>