https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303624 The Court held that the statutory scheme under the CrPC and Evidence Act incorporates constitutional safeguards against self-incrimination and the right to legal assistance, which arises on first production before the magistrate; no Miranda-style warning is required and no denial of fair trial was established. It further held that the Section 164 confession was voluntary and admissible because mandatory safeguards were followed, though parts referring to other accused were not relied on. On the evidence, the Court found a coordinated conspiracy and a cross-border assault amounting to waging war against the Government of India. Applying the rarest of rare doctrine, it confirmed the death sentence and upheld the acquittal of the other accused. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2022 15:20:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303624 The Court held that the statutory scheme under the CrPC and Evidence Act incorporates constitutional safeguards against self-incrimination and the right to legal assistance, which arises on first production before the magistrate; no Miranda-style warning is required and no denial of fair trial was established. It further held that the Section 164 confession was voluntary and admissible because mandatory safeguards were followed, though parts referring to other accused were not relied on. On the evidence, the Court found a coordinated conspiracy and a cross-border assault amounting to waging war against the Government of India. Applying the rarest of rare doctrine, it confirmed the death sentence and upheld the acquittal of the other accused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303624