<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Grants Interim Protection on Excise Duty Dispute; Special Rate Request Timely After Supreme Court Ruling.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64913</link>
    <description>Recovery of excise duty, penalty, etc., from the petitioner - fixation of special rate of excise duty - The petitioner has been able to show a prima facie case for hearing because if the requirement of requesting for fixation of a special rate in respect of value addition to the manufactured goods had arisen only after the final judgment of the Supreme Court of India on 22-4-2020, the period of limitation would stand extended for a period of 90 days from 3-10-2021 and therefore, the application which was submitted on 20-10-2021 by the petitioner was well within the period of limitation. Therefore, the balance of convenience tilts in favour of interim protection to the petitioner. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:23:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:23:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Grants Interim Protection on Excise Duty Dispute; Special Rate Request Timely After Supreme Court Ruling.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64913</link>
      <description>Recovery of excise duty, penalty, etc., from the petitioner - fixation of special rate of excise duty - The petitioner has been able to show a prima facie case for hearing because if the requirement of requesting for fixation of a special rate in respect of value addition to the manufactured goods had arisen only after the final judgment of the Supreme Court of India on 22-4-2020, the period of limitation would stand extended for a period of 90 days from 3-10-2021 and therefore, the application which was submitted on 20-10-2021 by the petitioner was well within the period of limitation. Therefore, the balance of convenience tilts in favour of interim protection to the petitioner. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:23:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>