<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 259 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30021</link>
    <description>An appeal against an interim direction of the lower appellate authority was held premature because the direction only required part pre-deposit and did not finally dispose of the appeal. The Tribunal noted that a further appeal to it would lie only after the lower appellate authority passed a final order in the pending appeal. On that basis, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable, and the accompanying stay petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 259 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30021</link>
      <description>An appeal against an interim direction of the lower appellate authority was held premature because the direction only required part pre-deposit and did not finally dispose of the appeal. The Tribunal noted that a further appeal to it would lie only after the lower appellate authority passed a final order in the pending appeal. On that basis, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable, and the accompanying stay petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>