<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 173 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30020</link>
    <description>In a service tax valuation dispute concerning annual maintenance contracts, the assessee established a prima facie case for excluding the value of spares and parts from the taxable base under the governing notification. The Tribunal noted that invoices and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate had been produced pursuant to remand and could not be rejected summarily without proper verification. The Commissioner&#039;s refusal to examine that evidence for quantification was found unsustainable at the interim stage. Waiver of pre-deposit of the disputed tax and penalties was therefore granted, and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 173 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30020</link>
      <description>In a service tax valuation dispute concerning annual maintenance contracts, the assessee established a prima facie case for excluding the value of spares and parts from the taxable base under the governing notification. The Tribunal noted that invoices and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate had been produced pursuant to remand and could not be rejected summarily without proper verification. The Commissioner&#039;s refusal to examine that evidence for quantification was found unsustainable at the interim stage. Waiver of pre-deposit of the disputed tax and penalties was therefore granted, and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>