https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303621 The appeal was dismissed by the CESTAT Ahmedabad as the impugned order was passed by the ADG (Adjudication), DRI, Mumbai, falling under the jurisdiction of CESTAT Mumbai. The appellant's argument citing Public Notices and judgments was rejected, leading to the conclusion that the appeal was non-maintainable in Ahmedabad. The appellant was given the liberty to file the appeal before the Mumbai bench, and the Early Hearing Application was disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2022 09:45:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303621 The appeal was dismissed by the CESTAT Ahmedabad as the impugned order was passed by the ADG (Adjudication), DRI, Mumbai, falling under the jurisdiction of CESTAT Mumbai. The appellant's argument citing Public Notices and judgments was rejected, leading to the conclusion that the appeal was non-maintainable in Ahmedabad. The appellant was given the liberty to file the appeal before the Mumbai bench, and the Early Hearing Application was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303621