<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 172 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalties in two appeals concerning disallowed credit based on an allocation chart issued by an input service distributor. A pre-deposit of Rs. 3,00,000/- and Rs. 10,00,000/- was directed within eight weeks, with waiver of the balance tax and penalty upon compliance. Failure to comply would result in the vacation of stay and dismissal of appeals. Compliance reporting by a specified date was mandated to avoid adverse consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 172 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalties in two appeals concerning disallowed credit based on an allocation chart issued by an input service distributor. A pre-deposit of Rs. 3,00,000/- and Rs. 10,00,000/- was directed within eight weeks, with waiver of the balance tax and penalty upon compliance. Failure to comply would result in the vacation of stay and dismissal of appeals. Compliance reporting by a specified date was mandated to avoid adverse consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>