<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 82 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425843</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 17,55,262/- for unexplained jewellery. Emphasizing family traditions and social status, the tribunal considered the concept of Streedhan and customs of the Rajput Community. The decision highlighted the failure of the AO and CIT(A) to acknowledge these factors, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 09:44:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 82 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425843</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 17,55,262/- for unexplained jewellery. Emphasizing family traditions and social status, the tribunal considered the concept of Streedhan and customs of the Rajput Community. The decision highlighted the failure of the AO and CIT(A) to acknowledge these factors, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>