<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 74 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425835</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the revocation of the Customs Broker Licence and limiting the forfeiture of the Security Deposit to Rs. 25,000. The decision aimed to balance justice by acknowledging the lack of evidence while imposing a penalty for the Appellant&#039;s failure to advise the client and exercise due diligence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 09:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 74 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425835</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the revocation of the Customs Broker Licence and limiting the forfeiture of the Security Deposit to Rs. 25,000. The decision aimed to balance justice by acknowledging the lack of evidence while imposing a penalty for the Appellant&#039;s failure to advise the client and exercise due diligence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>