<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 61 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425822</link>
    <description>The Court condones the delay in filing the appeal despite reservations about the reasons provided, as the tax effect is below the threshold limit. The appeal by the revenue challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order is disposed of due to the low tax effect, leaving the substantial questions of law raised for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 09:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 61 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425822</link>
      <description>The Court condones the delay in filing the appeal despite reservations about the reasons provided, as the tax effect is below the threshold limit. The appeal by the revenue challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order is disposed of due to the low tax effect, leaving the substantial questions of law raised for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>