https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425821 The Court granted interim protection to the petitioner, restraining the respondent authorities from enforcing the refund demand until the application for fixation of a special rate is decided. The petitioner was required to extend the solvency surety bond's validity if it had lapsed. The Court emphasized that these observations were not final opinions and would not prejudice the parties when the matter is finally heard on merit. The case was listed for further hearing on 10-1-2022. en-us Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425821 The Court granted interim protection to the petitioner, restraining the respondent authorities from enforcing the refund demand until the application for fixation of a special rate is decided. The petitioner was required to extend the solvency surety bond's validity if it had lapsed. The Court emphasized that these observations were not final opinions and would not prejudice the parties when the matter is finally heard on merit. The case was listed for further hearing on 10-1-2022. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425821