<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 110 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30012</link>
    <description>Demineralised water was treated as classifiable under the specific tariff entry for distilled or conductivity water of similar purity, and where used within the factory of production, under the nil-rated sub-heading. The department&#039;s attempt to classify it under the residual sub-heading was rejected because the same commodity had already been placed under the specific entry in the assessee&#039;s earlier appeal, and that view was applied to the present dispute. The demand of duty and the related penalty were therefore unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 110 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30012</link>
      <description>Demineralised water was treated as classifiable under the specific tariff entry for distilled or conductivity water of similar purity, and where used within the factory of production, under the nil-rated sub-heading. The department&#039;s attempt to classify it under the residual sub-heading was rejected because the same commodity had already been placed under the specific entry in the assessee&#039;s earlier appeal, and that view was applied to the present dispute. The demand of duty and the related penalty were therefore unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>