<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 46 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425807</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was refused where a celebratory gunshot allegedly struck the complainant, causing serious injury and amputation. The Court held that payment of medical expenses did not reduce the gravity of the alleged offence, and it declined to examine delay in lodging the FIR at that stage. As the weapon had not yet been recovered, custodial interrogation was considered necessary for effective investigation, and bail was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 46 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425807</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was refused where a celebratory gunshot allegedly struck the complainant, causing serious injury and amputation. The Court held that payment of medical expenses did not reduce the gravity of the alleged offence, and it declined to examine delay in lodging the FIR at that stage. As the weapon had not yet been recovered, custodial interrogation was considered necessary for effective investigation, and bail was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>