<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30007</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, affirming that the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) lacks the power to condone delays beyond the prescribed period, the Limitation Act does not apply to the Central Excise Act proceedings, and the High Court should not exercise its writ jurisdiction to condone the delay in this case. The petition was dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30007</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, affirming that the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) lacks the power to condone delays beyond the prescribed period, the Limitation Act does not apply to the Central Excise Act proceedings, and the High Court should not exercise its writ jurisdiction to condone the delay in this case. The petition was dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>