<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 22 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the order under Section 263 was invalidated due to non-service of notice on the assessee, who was in judicial custody, and the failure to grant the assessee an opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the order under Section 263 was quashed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 09:33:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 22 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the order under Section 263 was invalidated due to non-service of notice on the assessee, who was in judicial custody, and the failure to grant the assessee an opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the order under Section 263 was quashed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>