https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425776 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, making the Rule absolute and disposing of the petition in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The court held that the respondents could not raise the requisition upon the petitioner to meet alleged post-import requirements after a delay of almost 30 years. The court also noted that such long delays violate the principles of natural justice, as they deprive parties of the ability to marshal documents or witnesses. en-us Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425776 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, making the Rule absolute and disposing of the petition in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The court held that the respondents could not raise the requisition upon the petitioner to meet alleged post-import requirements after a delay of almost 30 years. The court also noted that such long delays violate the principles of natural justice, as they deprive parties of the ability to marshal documents or witnesses. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425776