<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425770</link>
    <description>A writ petition concerning alleged technical glitches in the SVLDR scheme portal should not be left to a fresh representation where the controversy had already crystallised on affidavits. Because the respondents had filed their stand and a mere direction to consider representation was unlikely to produce an effective resolution, the proper course was to restore the writ petition and decide it on merits. The order directing consideration of the representation was set aside and the matter was restored for substantive adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 09:32:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425770</link>
      <description>A writ petition concerning alleged technical glitches in the SVLDR scheme portal should not be left to a fresh representation where the controversy had already crystallised on affidavits. Because the respondents had filed their stand and a mere direction to consider representation was unlikely to produce an effective resolution, the proper course was to restore the writ petition and decide it on merits. The order directing consideration of the representation was set aside and the matter was restored for substantive adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>