https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425763 Constitutional scrutiny of Section 20 of the Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973 was said to require examination of the Act's object, scheme, Article 31C and the presumption of constitutionality, rather than summary invalidation on an incomplete record. The text also states that the compensation method based on three hundred times property tax needed fuller consideration by the High Court. On acquisition under Section 17, it records that mere delay between the preliminary notice and final notification did not by itself cause lapsing in a continuing welfare scheme, absent an express statutory lapsing provision, though the reasonableness of delay was left open for reconsideration. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jul 2022 12:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425763 Constitutional scrutiny of Section 20 of the Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973 was said to require examination of the Act's object, scheme, Article 31C and the presumption of constitutionality, rather than summary invalidation on an incomplete record. The text also states that the compensation method based on three hundred times property tax needed fuller consideration by the High Court. On acquisition under Section 17, it records that mere delay between the preliminary notice and final notification did not by itself cause lapsing in a continuing welfare scheme, absent an express statutory lapsing provision, though the reasonableness of delay was left open for reconsideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425763