<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 18 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29663</link>
    <description>Dividend income already included and assessed in an earlier year could not be taxed again in the later assessment year once the earlier assessment had attained finality, as the same income cannot be taxed twice in the hands of the same person. Dividend arising after the completed transfer of shares to Bharat Insurance Co. was also not assessable as the assessee&#039;s income, because he retained no beneficial interest and received the amounts only as a conduit under a fiduciary obligation to pass them on. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the dividend addition was upheld on both grounds, and the reference was answered against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 18 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29663</link>
      <description>Dividend income already included and assessed in an earlier year could not be taxed again in the later assessment year once the earlier assessment had attained finality, as the same income cannot be taxed twice in the hands of the same person. Dividend arising after the completed transfer of shares to Bharat Insurance Co. was also not assessable as the assessee&#039;s income, because he retained no beneficial interest and received the amounts only as a conduit under a fiduciary obligation to pass them on. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the dividend addition was upheld on both grounds, and the reference was answered against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>