https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303587 Common intention under Section 34 IPC may be inferred from concerted conduct, the weapons carried, motive, and surrounding circumstances, rather than from mere presence at the scene; on the facts described, the convictions were sustained on that basis. The text also states that an anonymous letter containing an admission relevant to motive was admissible as corroborative evidence because it was not a statement made to a police officer during investigation and therefore did not attract the Section 162 CrPC bar; it was treated as an admission under Section 21 of the Evidence Act. The convictions were upheld and the appeals failed on the substantial grounds raised. en-us Thu, 26 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jul 2022 17:33:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303587 Common intention under Section 34 IPC may be inferred from concerted conduct, the weapons carried, motive, and surrounding circumstances, rather than from mere presence at the scene; on the facts described, the convictions were sustained on that basis. The text also states that an anonymous letter containing an admission relevant to motive was admissible as corroborative evidence because it was not a statement made to a police officer during investigation and therefore did not attract the Section 162 CrPC bar; it was treated as an admission under Section 21 of the Evidence Act. The convictions were upheld and the appeals failed on the substantial grounds raised. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303587