<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 43 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29661</link>
    <description>Section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 did not apply to a gift of money made absolutely to the deceased&#039;s sons, because the donor was wholly excluded from possession, enjoyment and control of the gifted property; the amount was therefore excluded from the principal value of the estate. In relation to goodwill, the sons had contributed their own capital from the gifted funds and entered the partnership in their own right, so only the deceased&#039;s one-fourth share in the goodwill was treated as passing on death, while the remaining three-fourths was not dutiable. Both referred questions were answered in favour of the accountable persons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:51:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 43 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29661</link>
      <description>Section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 did not apply to a gift of money made absolutely to the deceased&#039;s sons, because the donor was wholly excluded from possession, enjoyment and control of the gifted property; the amount was therefore excluded from the principal value of the estate. In relation to goodwill, the sons had contributed their own capital from the gifted funds and entered the partnership in their own right, so only the deceased&#039;s one-fourth share in the goodwill was treated as passing on death, while the remaining three-fourths was not dutiable. Both referred questions were answered in favour of the accountable persons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>