<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1228 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303579</link>
    <description>Expired bank guarantees were to be returned within two weeks, and the remaining bank guarantee was not to be invoked or renewed; it was to be returned duly discharged on expiry without any insistence on renewal. The statement recorded by the respondents was accepted, and the notice of motion was disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2022 16:57:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1228 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303579</link>
      <description>Expired bank guarantees were to be returned within two weeks, and the remaining bank guarantee was not to be invoked or renewed; it was to be returned duly discharged on expiry without any insistence on renewal. The statement recorded by the respondents was accepted, and the notice of motion was disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>