<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (8) TMI 61 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303578</link>
    <description>For Order 9 Rule 6 CPC, &quot;hearing&quot; means a substantive judicial sitting where evidence is recorded, arguments are heard, or matters affecting final adjudication are considered. A day used only to receive a commissioner&#039;s report, without evidence, argument, or consideration of the suit on merits, is not a hearing for invoking ex parte procedure. On that basis, the proceedings on 29 June 1950 could not justify ex parte action against the defendants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2022 15:42:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (8) TMI 61 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303578</link>
      <description>For Order 9 Rule 6 CPC, &quot;hearing&quot; means a substantive judicial sitting where evidence is recorded, arguments are heard, or matters affecting final adjudication are considered. A day used only to receive a commissioner&#039;s report, without evidence, argument, or consideration of the suit on merits, is not a hearing for invoking ex parte procedure. On that basis, the proceedings on 29 June 1950 could not justify ex parte action against the defendants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>