https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303577 The appellate court allowed the appeal, setting aside the initial decree and granting possession of the properties to the plaintiff along with mesne profits. The court found that the adoption of defendant No. 2 was invalid and emphasized the inadequacy of the agreement Exh. B14. The plaintiff was entitled to mesne profits for three years preceding the suit date, as well as pendent lite and future mesne profits until possession was delivered. The court directed the trial court to determine the amount of mesne profits owed by defendant No. 2, with a final decree to be issued upon payment of requisite court fees. en-us Fri, 02 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jul 2022 15:34:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303577 The appellate court allowed the appeal, setting aside the initial decree and granting possession of the properties to the plaintiff along with mesne profits. The court found that the adoption of defendant No. 2 was invalid and emphasized the inadequacy of the agreement Exh. B14. The plaintiff was entitled to mesne profits for three years preceding the suit date, as well as pendent lite and future mesne profits until possession was delivered. The court directed the trial court to determine the amount of mesne profits owed by defendant No. 2, with a final decree to be issued upon payment of requisite court fees. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303577