<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1123 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303570</link>
    <description>Section 406 CrPC permits transfer of a criminal trial only when there is a well-substantiated, reasonable apprehension that justice will not be administered impartially. The text explains that a prosecuting agency like the CBI, after taking over investigation and prosecution, can qualify as a &quot;party interested&quot; under Section 406(2) and may seek transfer. It also states that fair trial concerns under Article 21 require concrete material, not conjecture, bald allegations, former associations, or mere inconvenience. On the facts described, no reasonable bias was shown, so the trial was to continue at Ghaziabad and proceed expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2022 13:20:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1123 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303570</link>
      <description>Section 406 CrPC permits transfer of a criminal trial only when there is a well-substantiated, reasonable apprehension that justice will not be administered impartially. The text explains that a prosecuting agency like the CBI, after taking over investigation and prosecution, can qualify as a &quot;party interested&quot; under Section 406(2) and may seek transfer. It also states that fair trial concerns under Article 21 require concrete material, not conjecture, bald allegations, former associations, or mere inconvenience. On the facts described, no reasonable bias was shown, so the trial was to continue at Ghaziabad and proceed expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>