<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1302 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425747</link>
    <description>Treaty definitions of fees for technical services and royalty prevailed over wider domestic rules, and the protocol allowed reliance on the more beneficial OECD-based treaty position. Intra-group service receipts were taxable only to the extent they involved development and transfer of a technical plan or technical design, so the matter required restricted recomputation. Cost-to-cost recovery of leased line charges was not royalty because the DTAA did not adopt the domestic enlargement of &quot;process&quot;. Reimbursement of software costs for antivirus products was also not royalty, as there was no transfer of copyright. Interest under section 234B was not leviable on the non-resident assessee on the facts found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2022 08:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1302 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425747</link>
      <description>Treaty definitions of fees for technical services and royalty prevailed over wider domestic rules, and the protocol allowed reliance on the more beneficial OECD-based treaty position. Intra-group service receipts were taxable only to the extent they involved development and transfer of a technical plan or technical design, so the matter required restricted recomputation. Cost-to-cost recovery of leased line charges was not royalty because the DTAA did not adopt the domestic enlargement of &quot;process&quot;. Reimbursement of software costs for antivirus products was also not royalty, as there was no transfer of copyright. Interest under section 234B was not leviable on the non-resident assessee on the facts found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>