<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1288 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425733</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to assess based on the belated notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The defect was deemed substantive and not curable under Section 292B, resulting in the assessment order being considered nonest and subsequently quashed. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 23/06/2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1288 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425733</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to assess based on the belated notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The defect was deemed substantive and not curable under Section 292B, resulting in the assessment order being considered nonest and subsequently quashed. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 23/06/2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>