<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 19 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29651</link>
    <description>Section 297 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 distinguishes between assessments completed before 1 April 1962 and those completed on or after that date. Where reassessment is completed after 1 April 1962, penalty proceedings for concealment are to be initiated and penalty imposed under the 1961 Act, not the repealed 1922 Act. In that setting, the minimum penalty prescribed by the 1961 Act applies, as the post-1962 assessment brings the matter within the new statute&#039;s penalty regime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:24:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 19 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29651</link>
      <description>Section 297 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 distinguishes between assessments completed before 1 April 1962 and those completed on or after that date. Where reassessment is completed after 1 April 1962, penalty proceedings for concealment are to be initiated and penalty imposed under the 1961 Act, not the repealed 1922 Act. In that setting, the minimum penalty prescribed by the 1961 Act applies, as the post-1962 assessment brings the matter within the new statute&#039;s penalty regime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>