https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425712 The Court directed the respondents to rectify Forms 3, record the credit of taxes deposited, and issue revised Forms within four weeks. Petitioners were instructed to file Forms 4 within two weeks. The rejection of credit for taxes deposited due to a minor head error was deemed unfair, illegal, and contrary to the Act's objective. The Court emphasized the need for technology to facilitate transactions without impeding legal rights. en-us Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425712 The Court directed the respondents to rectify Forms 3, record the credit of taxes deposited, and issue revised Forms within four weeks. Petitioners were instructed to file Forms 4 within two weeks. The rejection of credit for taxes deposited due to a minor head error was deemed unfair, illegal, and contrary to the Act's objective. The Court emphasized the need for technology to facilitate transactions without impeding legal rights. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425712