<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1262 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the CIT(A) to allow the deduction for interest expenditure related to loans from Dynasty Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. and remanding the other claims for re-adjudication by the A.O. The Tribunal also allowed the deduction for interest paid on loans from Mary Mithai, V.K Satija HUF, Jaya Solanki, and Yashwant Rao Kavre based on consistency with the previous assessment year. The general ground of appeal was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 21:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1262 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the CIT(A) to allow the deduction for interest expenditure related to loans from Dynasty Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. and remanding the other claims for re-adjudication by the A.O. The Tribunal also allowed the deduction for interest paid on loans from Mary Mithai, V.K Satija HUF, Jaya Solanki, and Yashwant Rao Kavre based on consistency with the previous assessment year. The general ground of appeal was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>