<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 18 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29648</link>
    <description>Profit on sale of agricultural land is taxable as business income where the surrounding facts show a commercial venture or adventure in the nature of trade, including repeated steps to secure non-agricultural use and develop the property. The character of the transaction is determined from the totality of relevant facts, and land held and dealt with as part of a business activity does not retain a mere investment character. Restrictions under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code were not shown to prohibit such a transfer, and sale proceeds did not meet the statutory definition of agricultural income. The surplus was therefore treated as taxable business income, not exempt agricultural income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:18:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 18 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29648</link>
      <description>Profit on sale of agricultural land is taxable as business income where the surrounding facts show a commercial venture or adventure in the nature of trade, including repeated steps to secure non-agricultural use and develop the property. The character of the transaction is determined from the totality of relevant facts, and land held and dealt with as part of a business activity does not retain a mere investment character. Restrictions under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code were not shown to prohibit such a transfer, and sale proceeds did not meet the statutory definition of agricultural income. The surplus was therefore treated as taxable business income, not exempt agricultural income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>