https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425697 The appeal was dismissed, upholding adverse remarks against the Resolution Professional (RP) in the Impugned Order. The RP failed to adequately verify claims, present complete facts to the Committee of Creditors (CoC), misinterpret Regulation 12 on claim submission, and fulfill responsibilities under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Adjudicating Authority affirmed findings of unprofessionalism and dereliction of duty by the RP. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jul 2022 21:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425697 The appeal was dismissed, upholding adverse remarks against the Resolution Professional (RP) in the Impugned Order. The RP failed to adequately verify claims, present complete facts to the Committee of Creditors (CoC), misinterpret Regulation 12 on claim submission, and fulfill responsibilities under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Adjudicating Authority affirmed findings of unprofessionalism and dereliction of duty by the RP. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425697