<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1244 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application, condoned the delay in filing the claim, and directed the Respondent to accept the applicant&#039;s claim for further processing. The Tribunal emphasized that claim rejections solely based on delays were not sustainable, especially when the insolvency resolution process was ongoing without an approved resolution plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 19:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1244 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application, condoned the delay in filing the claim, and directed the Respondent to accept the applicant&#039;s claim for further processing. The Tribunal emphasized that claim rejections solely based on delays were not sustainable, especially when the insolvency resolution process was ongoing without an approved resolution plan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>