<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1954 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the first appellate authority&#039;s decision to delete both the additions of unexplained share capital and the loan from K.G. Construction for the Assessment Year 2012-13. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer lacked a clear basis for the additions and criticized the lack of proper verification and timing in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 20:55:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1954 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the first appellate authority&#039;s decision to delete both the additions of unexplained share capital and the loan from K.G. Construction for the Assessment Year 2012-13. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer lacked a clear basis for the additions and criticized the lack of proper verification and timing in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>