<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 23 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29643</link>
    <description>Section 16A of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 can be invoked only for the purpose of making an assessment, so the jurisdiction to refer an asset for valuation depends on an assessment that is actually pending or otherwise lawfully in progress. Proceedings for assessment begin when a return is filed or when a person fails to comply with notice under Section 14(2). On the admitted facts, no assessment was pending when the reference was made, so the statutory precondition was absent. The Madhya Pradesh High Court held the reference to the Valuation Officer, the valuation proceedings, and the valuation order to be without jurisdiction and quashed them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:06:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 23 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29643</link>
      <description>Section 16A of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 can be invoked only for the purpose of making an assessment, so the jurisdiction to refer an asset for valuation depends on an assessment that is actually pending or otherwise lawfully in progress. Proceedings for assessment begin when a return is filed or when a person fails to comply with notice under Section 14(2). On the admitted facts, no assessment was pending when the reference was made, so the statutory precondition was absent. The Madhya Pradesh High Court held the reference to the Valuation Officer, the valuation proceedings, and the valuation order to be without jurisdiction and quashed them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>