https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303537 Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned, and the Court then exercised appellate restraint on the basis of concurrent factual findings. Because the respondent's commercial area was found to be less than 10% of the total housing development, the Court treated that limited commercial component as a material factual circumstance and declined to interfere with the impugned judgment. The special leave petition was dismissed, with no disturbance to the concurrent decision. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:50:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303537 Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned, and the Court then exercised appellate restraint on the basis of concurrent factual findings. Because the respondent's commercial area was found to be less than 10% of the total housing development, the Court treated that limited commercial component as a material factual circumstance and declined to interfere with the impugned judgment. The special leave petition was dismissed, with no disturbance to the concurrent decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303537