<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 870 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303535</link>
    <description>Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the opposite party&#039;s contractual right to appoint a sole arbitrator is forfeited if it does not act before the Section 11(6) application is filed, and a later unilateral appointment has no legal effect. Section 11(8) requires regard to contractual qualifications and the need for an independent, impartial arbitrator; where no special qualification is prescribed, an appointment by the defaulting party&#039;s own officer does not meet that standard. The refusal to appoint an arbitrator was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration of the appointment request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2024 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 870 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303535</link>
      <description>Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the opposite party&#039;s contractual right to appoint a sole arbitrator is forfeited if it does not act before the Section 11(6) application is filed, and a later unilateral appointment has no legal effect. Section 11(8) requires regard to contractual qualifications and the need for an independent, impartial arbitrator; where no special qualification is prescribed, an appointment by the defaulting party&#039;s own officer does not meet that standard. The refusal to appoint an arbitrator was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration of the appointment request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>